{"id":449,"date":"2018-05-28T08:39:02","date_gmt":"2018-05-28T08:39:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/?page_id=449"},"modified":"2020-11-30T13:44:15","modified_gmt":"2020-11-30T13:44:15","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Select publications from project investigators<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Alcal\u00e1-L\u00f3pez D, Smallwood J, Jefferies E, Van Overwalle F, Vogeley K, Mars RB, Turetsky BI, Laird AR, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D: Computing the Social Brain Connectome Across Systems and States. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 18:1-26. doi: 10.1093\/cercor\/bhx121. [Epub ahead of print]<\/p>\n<p>Jennifer A. Chandler and Adam Dodek, \u201cCognitive enhancement in the courtroom:\u00a0 What can we learn about the ethics of pharmacological cognitive enhancement by looking at judicial cognition?\u201d in Dubljevic and Jotterand, eds. Cognitive Enhancement: Ethical and Policy Implications in International Perspectives, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016).<\/p>\n<p>Chandler JA, Harrel N and Potkonjak T. \u201cNeurolaw today:\u00a0 A systematic review of the recent law and neuroscience literature\u201d (online first 2018 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry).<\/p>\n<p>Jens Clausen, Eberhard Fetz, John Donoghue, Junichi Ushiba, Ulrike Sporhase, Jennifer Chandler, Niels Birbaumer, Surjo R. Soekadar, 2017. Help, hope and hype:\u00a0 Ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics. Science. 356(6345):1338-1339.<\/p>\n<p>Jennifer A Chandler, \u201cThe impact of biological psychiatry on the law:\u00a0 Evidence, blame and social solidarity\u201d (2017) 54(3) Alberta Law Review 831-848.<\/p>\n<p>Jennifer A. Chandler, \u201cMind, Brain and Law:\u00a0 Issues at the Intersection of Neuroscience, Personal Identity and the Legal System,\u201d in Clausen J. and Levy, N. eds. Handbook of Neuroethics, (Dordrecht: Springer Publishing, 2015) p. 441-458.<\/p>\n<p>Jennifer A. Chandler, \u201cThe impact of neuroscience in the law:\u00a0 How perceptions of control and responsibility affect the definition of disability\u201d in Illes ed., Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future (Oxford University Press, 2017).<\/p>\n<p>Pfeiffer U, Schilbach L, Timmermans B, Kuzmanovic B, Georgescu A, Bente G, Vogeley K: Why we interact: On the Functional Role of the Striatum in the Subjective Experience of Social Interaction. Neuroimage 101C, 124-137, 2014<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4, On the Nontechnical Limits of Brain Imaging. <i>Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,<\/i><i>29<\/i>(4), 527-541. doi:10.1017\/S0963180120000298<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4, Special Issue on Neuroethics. <i>The Monist<\/i> 95 (2012).<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4. \u201cBrain Imaging and Privacy\u201d, <i>Neuroethics<\/i> 3 (2010), 5-12.<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4 and Juho Ritola, \u201cBook Review of Eric Racine&#8217;s Pragmatic Neuroethics\u201d, <i>Philosophy in Review<\/i> 31 (2011), 228-231.<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4, \u201cAutonomy and Genetic Privacy\u201d in V. Launis and J. R\u00e4ikk\u00e4 (Eds.), <i>Genetic Democracy: Philosophical Perspectives <\/i>(Springer, London 2008), 43-52.<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4, \u201dAutonomy and Cultural Rights: The Argument of Cultural Disadvantage\u201d in Z. Skurbaty (Ed.) <i>Beyond a One-Dimensional State: An Emerging Right to Autonomy? <\/i>(Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 2005), 211-229.<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4, \u201cFreedom and a Right (Not) to Know\u201d, <i>Bioethics<\/i> 12 (1998), 49-6<\/p>\n<p>Juha R\u00e4ikk\u00e4 &amp; Jukka Varelius (Eds.) (2013). <em>Adaptation and Autonomy: Adaptive Preferences in Enhancing and Ending Life.<\/em> Springer.<\/p>\n<p>Schilbach L, Timmermans B, Reddy V, Bente G, Costall A, Schlicht T, Vogeley K: Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 383-414, 2013<\/p>\n<p>Varelius, J. (2020) \u2018Would Nonconsensual Criminal Neurorehabilitation Express a More Degrading Attitude Towards Offenders Than Consensual Criminal Neurorehabilitation?\u2019 Neuroethics, forthcoming.<\/p>\n<p>Varelius, J. (2020) \u2018Autism Spectrum Condition, Good and Bad Motives of Offending, and Sentencing.\u2019 Neuroethics, <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12152-020-09432-w\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12152-020-09432-w<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Varelius, J. (2020) \u2018Can Self-Validating Neuroenhancement be Autonomous?\u2019 Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Vol. 23(1): 51-59.<\/p>\n<p>Varelius, J. (2020) \u2018Neuroenhancement, the Criminal Justice System, and the Problem of Alienation.\u2019 Neuroethics Vol. 13(3): 325\u2013335.<\/p>\n<p>Varelius, J. (2020) \u2018An Irrational Suicide.\u2019 In Cholbi, M. &amp; Timmerman, T. eds. Exploring the Philosophy of Death and Dying: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Routledge.<\/p>\n<p>Vogeley K, Roepstorff A: Contextualising Culture and Social Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science 13, 511-516, 2009<\/p>\n<p>Vogeley K: Communication as Fundamental Paradigm for Psychopathology. In Newen A, de Bruin L, Gallagher S (Ed.): The Oxford Handbook of 4e Cognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (forthcoming)<\/p>\n<p>Vogeley K: Two social brains: neural mechanisms of intersubjectivity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). pii: 20160245. doi: 10.1098\/rstb.2016.0245.<\/p>\n<p>Whitehead, R. and Chandler JA., \u201cBiocriminal justice:\u00a0 Exploring public attitudes to criminal rehabilitation using biomedical treatments\u201d (online first 2018 Neuroethics)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Select publications from project investigators Alcal\u00e1-L\u00f3pez D, Smallwood J, Jefferies E, Van Overwalle F, Vogeley K, Mars RB, Turetsky BI, Laird AR, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D: Computing the Social Brain Connectome Across Systems and States. Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 18:1-26. doi: 10.1093\/cercor\/bhx121. [Epub ahead of print] Jennifer A. Chandler and Adam Dodek, \u201cCognitive [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":118,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-449","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/118"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=449"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/449\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":588,"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/449\/revisions\/588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogit.utu.fi\/neuroautonomy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}